Ubuntu 22 Boot Errors

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

Java Jive

2024-12-08 11:41:05 UTC

I'm going round my Ubuntu 22 machines trying to remove error and fail
messages from the boot, mostly successfully, but five anomalies are
proving hard to fix, despite which the PCs all seem to work ...

1) IOAPIC

This is occurring on more than one PC. Searching for ...

ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

... gave hits but seemingly no useful way of finding and removing the
cause. Relevant output from 'journalctl -b' is apparently just ...

Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 38

... but here, in case it's relevant, are those lines in a wider context:

Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA
KINGSTON SKC600M 0105 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2
type 0
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] 500118192 512-byte
logical blocks: (256 GB/238 GiB)
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] 4096-byte physical blocks
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled,
read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Preferred minimum I/O
size 4096 bytes
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] supports TCG Opal
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 38
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eno1: renamed from eth0
Dec 07 18:49:55 HOSTNAME kernel: EXT4-fs (sdb4): mounted filesystem
028fbdaf-b201-4b38-9471-d1c09dbc51c5 ro with ordered data mode. Quota
mode: none.

2) blkmapd

I think this is occurring on ALL my Ubuntu 22 machines. Appears to be
related to NFS, but networking seems fine (apart from a minor seemingly
unrelated issue already solved). Searching for ...

"blkmapd[717]: open pipe file /run/rpc_pipefs/nfs/blocklayout
failed: No such file or directory"

... yielded hits linking to or repeating one potential solution here ...

https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=323585

sudo mkdir /etc/systemd/system/nfs-blkmap.service.d
sudo cat > /etc/systemd/system/nfs-blkmap.service.d/fixpipe.conf <<EOF
#
[Service]
ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe blocklayoutdriver
EOF

... but the suggestion didn't work for me on any of my machines. Full
log is just a single line:

Dec 07 00:24:10 HOSTNAME blkmapd[717]: open pipe file
/run/rpc_pipefs/nfs/blocklayout failed: No such file or directory

3) CUPS Scheduler

This also is occuring on many or all of my Ubuntu 22 machines, even a
while after a successful boot. Oddly the status of cups service always
shows it to be working.

Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: start operation timed
out. Terminating.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: Failed with result
'timeout'.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Failed to start CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: Scheduled restart
job, restart counter is at 5.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopped CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.path: Deactivated successfully.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopped CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopping CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.socket: Deactivated successfully.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Closed CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopping CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Listening on CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Starting CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME audit[1760]: AVC apparmor="DENIED"
operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" pid=1760 comm="cupsd"
capability=12 capname="net_>

4) UBSAN

This is on a laptop with two on-board GPUs, and I think is related to
that fact. However, there were no hits under DuckDuckGo, Google, or
Yahoo for ...

Ubuntu 22 "UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in
/build/linux-hwe-6.8-W0MdK2/linux-hwe-6.8-6.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c:633:33"

... full output from 'journalctl -b' is (two sections):

Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in
/build/linux-hwe-6.8-W0MdK2/linux-hwe-6.8-6.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c:633:33
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: index 22 is out of range for type 'int
[22]'
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: CPU: 1 PID: 376 Comm: systemd-udevd Not
tainted 6.8.0-47-generic #47~22.04.1-Ubuntu
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision
M6800/0F5HF3, BIOS A26 06/13/2019
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: <TASK>
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x76/0xa0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: dump_stack+0x10/0x20
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xc6/0x110
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel:
radeon_get_atom_connector_info_from_object_table+0xa1e/0xa80 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ?
radeon_get_atom_connector_info_from_supported_devices_table+0x797/0x890
[radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon_modeset_init+0x36b/0x3f0 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? radeon_modeset_init+0x36b/0x3f0 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon_driver_load_kms+0xdf/0x300 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: drm_dev_register+0x12b/0x2a0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon_pci_probe+0xec/0x180 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: pci_call_probe+0x55/0x1a0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: pci_device_probe+0x84/0x120
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: really_probe+0x1cc/0x430
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x190
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: __driver_attach+0x10b/0x210
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: bus_for_each_dev+0x8d/0xf0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: driver_attach+0x1e/0x30
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: bus_add_driver+0x14e/0x290
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: driver_register+0x5e/0x130
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? __pfx_radeon_module_init+0x10/0x10
[radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: __pci_register_driver+0x5e/0x70
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon_module_init+0x4c/0xff0 [radeon]
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x340
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: do_init_module+0x97/0x290
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: load_module+0xb85/0xcd0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0x75/0x90
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: init_module_from_file+0x96/0x100
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? init_module_from_file+0x96/0x100
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: idempotent_init_module+0x11c/0x2b0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: __x64_sys_finit_module+0x64/0xd0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: x64_sys_call+0x169c/0x24b0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: do_syscall_64+0x81/0x170
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ? irqentry_exit+0x43/0x50
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0x80
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7372f531e88d
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00
00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8
4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 b5 0f 00
f7 d8 64 >
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: RSP: 002b:00007fff96f14378 EFLAGS:
00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX:
000063415483a6b0 RCX: 00007372f531e88d
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI:
00007372f5599441 RDI: 0000000000000015
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: RBP: 0000000000020000 R08:
0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: R10: 0000000000000015 R11:
0000000000000246 R12: 00007372f5599441
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: R13: 000063415473c130 R14:
000063415483a7a0 R15: 00006341548364e0
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: </TASK>
Dec 06 23:15:49 HOSTNAME kernel: ---[ end trace ]---

... later ...

Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] PCIE GART of 2048M enabled (table
at 0x00000000001D6000).
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: WB enabled
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 0 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c00
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 1 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c04
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 2 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c08
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 3 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c0c
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 4 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c10
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 5 use gpu addr 0x0000000000075a18
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 6 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c18
Dec 07 17:08:16 HOSTNAME kernel: radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on
ring 7 use gpu addr 0x0000000080000c1c
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_gfx' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_cp1' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_cp2' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_dma1' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_dma2' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 1 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 1 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 1 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 9 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 3 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_uvd' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] UVD initialized successfully.
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_vce1' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: debugfs: File 'radeon_ring_vce2' in
directory '0' already present!
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 6 succeeded in 12 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ring test on 7 succeeded in 4 usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] VCE initialized successfully.
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 0 succeeded in 0
usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 1 succeeded in 0
usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 2 succeeded in 0
usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 3 succeeded in 0
usecs
Dec 07 17:08:17 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 4 succeeded in 0
usecs
Dec 07 17:08:18 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 5 succeeded
Dec 07 17:08:18 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 6 succeeded
Dec 07 17:08:19 HOSTNAME kernel: [drm] ib test on ring 7 succeeded

5) Initiating RAM registers

The following is occurring very early in the logs on 2 machines with
32GB RAM, and seems to be about how set up registers for RAM access, as
per these two links ...

https://web.archive.org/web/20190904223631/http://my-fuzzy-logic.de/blog/index.php?/archives/41-Solving-linux-MTRR-problems.html
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/solved-proxmox-8-1-3-secureboot-and-bad-gran-size-errors-how-to-fix.138470/

Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: total RAM covered: 32702M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size:
128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size:
256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size:
512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 1M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size:
16M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size:
32M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 64M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 128M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 256M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 512M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size:
256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size:
512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 1M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size:
16M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256K chunk_size:
32M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 64M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 128M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 256M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 512M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 256K chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size:
512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 1M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size:
16M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 512K chunk_size:
32M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 64M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 128M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 256M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 512M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 512K chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 1M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 1M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 1M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 2M chunk_size: 2M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 2M chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 2M chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 2M chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 2M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -272M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 2M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1296M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 4M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -270M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1294M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 8M chunk_size: 8M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 8M chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 8M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -266M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 8M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1290M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 16M chunk_size: 16M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 110M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 16M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 238M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
64M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -274M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -242M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 16M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -1266M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 32M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 62M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 64M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 30M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 32M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 30M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 32M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 30M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 32M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -226M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 30M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 32M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -994M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64M chunk_size: 64M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 62M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 62M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 62M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -194M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 64M chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 62M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64M chunk_size:
2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -962M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128M chunk_size:
128M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 190M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 190M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 512M
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -66M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 190M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -834M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256M chunk_size:
256M num_reg: 6 lose cover RAM: 446M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256M chunk_size:
512M num_reg: 6 lose cover RAM: 446M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 1G
num_reg: 7 lose cover RAM: 446M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 446M
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: Linux version 6.8.0-47-generic
(***@lcy02-amd64-019) (x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-12 (Ubuntu
12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 12.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.38)
#47~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_D

--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk

Andy Burns

2024-12-08 12:00:34 UTC

Permalink

ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

Possible dodgy config tables in BIOS/UEFI.

firmware upgrade?
or legacy options you can disable?

Java Jive

2024-12-10 13:42:31 UTC

Permalink

Post by Andy Burns

ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

Possible dodgy config tables in BIOS/UEFI.
firmware upgrade?
or legacy options you can disable?

Yes, thanks, thinking that there might be something to any of your
suggestions above, I've spent the last day or so trying to determine
exactly which PCs were showing that fault. Originally, I'm fairly sure
that there were more than just one, but now it seems to be just one,
this one. I think the difference between the time of my OP and now is
that in the meantime I've continued trying to clean up the boot
messages, and this has involved uninstalling Virtualbox on all of the
PCs, including this one. So ...

My best guess for the other PCs is that Virtualbox was causing the messages.

As for this PC, which is a Dell Precision M6800, something that I've
noticed for the M6700/6800 series, which are of near identical design to
each other, is that sometimes the COM port shows up under Windows as
having problems and not installing properly. I'm not quite sure why
this should be, but as there is no external serial connector anyway, and
I haven't used an actual COM port [*] for around two decades either, I
haven't bothered to investigate this phenomenon further.

* I've used USB-to-low-voltage-serial cables, such as the Sony DKU-5
cable that used to be used to connect their phones to a PC, to flash
hardware such as routers, but not an actual COM port.

Putting the above together with the fact that I've noticed that, on a
Dell Inspiron, a daughterboard for connecting an NVMe only actually has
the connector on those model variants that were supplied originally with
an NVMe drive, other models have an otherwise identical daughterboard
but without the actual connector - thus saving a few cents per PC
sale! - I'm wondering if with these M6700/6800s Dell may have been
doing something similar, populating the boards with some, but not all,
of the hardware necessary for the COM port, this time saving on some of
the actual chips required instead of just a connector.

Either that or a PCB has a fault, but, being ATM in the middle of
'churning' my hardware, I have three of these machines, and two of them
show similar symptoms relating to the COM port, which seems a rather
high improbability of 2 out of 3 machines bought pseudo randomly from
different eBay suppliers having the same board fault on arrival?

At any rate, my best guess for this PC is that the original message that
I queried is being caused by the 'faulty' COM port.

--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk

Paul

2024-12-10 14:40:30 UTC

Permalink

Post by Andy Burns

ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

Possible dodgy config tables in BIOS/UEFI.
firmware upgrade?
or legacy options you can disable?

Yes, thanks, thinking that there might be something to any of your suggestions above, I've spent the last day or so trying to determine exactly which PCs were showing that fault. Originally, I'm fairly sure that there were more than just one, but now it seems to be just one, this one. I think the difference between the time of my OP and now is that in the meantime I've continued trying to clean up the boot messages, and this has involved uninstalling Virtualbox on all of the PCs, including this one. So ...
My best guess for the other PCs is that Virtualbox was causing the messages.
As for this PC, which is a Dell Precision M6800, something that I've noticed for the M6700/6800 series, which are of near identical design to each other, is that sometimes the COM port shows up under Windows as having problems and not installing properly. I'm not quite sure why this should be, but as there is no external serial connector anyway, and I haven't used an actual COM port [*] for around two decades either, I haven't bothered to investigate this phenomenon further.
* I've used USB-to-low-voltage-serial cables, such as the Sony DKU-5 cable that used to be used to connect their phones to a PC, to flash hardware such as routers, but not an actual COM port.
Putting the above together with the fact that I've noticed that, on a Dell Inspiron, a daughterboard for connecting an NVMe only actually has the connector on those model variants that were supplied originally with an NVMe drive, other models have an otherwise identical daughterboard but without the actual connector - thus saving a few cents per PC sale! - I'm wondering if with these M6700/6800s Dell may have been doing something similar, populating the boards with some, but not all, of the hardware necessary for the COM port, this time saving on some of the actual chips required instead of just a connector.
Either that or a PCB has a fault, but, being ATM in the middle of 'churning' my hardware, I have three of these machines, and two of them show similar symptoms relating to the COM port, which seems a rather high improbability of 2 out of 3 machines bought pseudo randomly from different eBay suppliers having the same board fault on arrival?
At any rate, my best guess for this PC is that the original message that I queried is being caused by the 'faulty' COM port.

This is just a random suggestion, with no evidence to back it up.

Power off the machine, remove one of the DIMMs and try your dmesg
readout a second time. and see if your granularity issue changes.

it could be that the address map on the chipset is defective somehow.

The machine I'm typing on, has such a problem, and it used to freeze
in the graphics driver, because the shared memory was somehow double defined
or something. It's my suspicion that with less than max RAM installed,
it would behave itself.

*******

The other idea I tried out here, is I figured a machine with Intel Management Engine,
the addressing may need to provide space for Minux to run. And maybe the offset
causes by that, is the problem. But when I tested that theory on the Optiplex 780,
dmesg was as clean as could be. It looked like PAT had been used. So that does not
look like a credible possibility.

Paul

vallor

2024-12-09 03:36:32 UTC

Permalink

Post by Java Jive
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -834M

I don't know why this would happen, but if it happened to me,
I'd run "lsmem" and "free" and make sure all the memory eventually
made it online...

Also, it looks like it might have something to do with mtrr. On
my host, dmesg reads:

[ 0.000000] total RAM covered: 3071M
[ 0.000000] Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
[ 0.000000] gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128M num_reg: 3
lose cover RAM: 0G
[ 0.000000] MTRR map: 7 entries (3 fixed + 4 variable; max 20), built
from 9 variable MTRRs

So these entries may be due to MTRR, which according to
Documentation/arch/x86/mtrr.rst is getting phased out. On my
system, I see this when I cat /proc/mtrr:

$ sudo cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x000000000 ( 0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back
reg01: base=0x080000000 ( 2048MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: write-back
reg02: base=0x0ba0a0000 ( 2976MB), size= 64KB, count=1: uncachable

Give a gander to that document, it outlines what mtrr might be used for
in modern-day kernels.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Documentation/arch/x86/mtrr.rst?h=v6.12.3

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
OS: Linux 6.12.3 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G

Java Jive

2024-12-09 20:33:25 UTC

Permalink

Post by vallor

Post by Java Jive
Dec 06 21:18:47 HOSTNAME kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 2G
num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -834M

I don't know why this would happen, but if it happened to me,
I'd run "lsmem" and "free" and make sure all the memory eventually
made it online...

My first reaction on seeing the messages - which in my OP I should
have mentioned that I'd already done, but it slipped my mind - was to
boot into memcheck and let a full cycle complete, but no memory problems
were found.

Post by vallor
Also, it looks like it might have something to do with mtrr.

Yes, as originally I linked.

Post by vallor
On
[ 0.000000] total RAM covered: 3071M
[ 0.000000] Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
[ 0.000000] gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128M num_reg: 3
lose cover RAM: 0G
[ 0.000000] MTRR map: 7 entries (3 fixed + 4 variable; max 20), built
from 9 variable MTRRs
So these entries may be due to MTRR, which according to
Documentation/arch/x86/mtrr.rst is getting phased out. On my
$ sudo cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0x000000000 ( 0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back
reg01: base=0x080000000 ( 2048MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: write-back
reg02: base=0x0ba0a0000 ( 2976MB), size= 64KB, count=1: uncachable
Give a gander to that document, it outlines what mtrr might be used for
in modern-day kernels.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Documentation/arch/x86/mtrr.rst?h=v6.12.3

These are both Dell Precisions, an M6700 and an M6800, so no chance of
PAT. One of the links I gave suggests giving some kernel boot
parameters to suggest a good compromise setting which minimises unused
RAM and thereby saves the failed testing which gave rise to the testing
trace that I quoted. I wan't very specific in my OP, but it think the
best I can do is determine such boot parameters, and any help with that
from someone more knowledgeable than myself would be much appreciated.

--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk

Theo

2024-12-11 14:53:10 UTC

Permalink

Post by Java Jive
I'm going round my Ubuntu 22 machines trying to remove error and fail
messages from the boot, mostly successfully, but five anomalies are
proving hard to fix, despite which the PCs all seem to work ...
1) IOAPIC
This is occurring on more than one PC. Searching for ...
ERROR: Unable to locate IOAPIC for GSI 37

That means it can't work out which interrupt controller is used for a
particular interrupt. Likely means the ACPI tables are incomplete. If
everything works you can ignore this.

Post by Java Jive
2) blkmapd
I think this is occurring on ALL my Ubuntu 22 machines. Appears to be
related to NFS, but networking seems fine (apart from a minor seemingly
unrelated issue already solved). Searching for ...
"blkmapd[717]: open pipe file /run/rpc_pipefs/nfs/blocklayout
failed: No such file or directory"

Are you actually running NFS? If not you can ignore this.

Post by Java Jive
3) CUPS Scheduler
This also is occuring on many or all of my Ubuntu 22 machines, even a
while after a successful boot. Oddly the status of cups service always
shows it to be working.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: start operation timed
out. Terminating.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: Failed with result
'timeout'.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Failed to start CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.service: Scheduled restart
job, restart counter is at 5.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopped CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.path: Deactivated successfully.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopped CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopping CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: cups.socket: Deactivated successfully.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Closed CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Stopping CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Listening on CUPS Scheduler.
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME systemd[1]: Starting CUPS Scheduler...
Dec 07 17:06:00 HOSTNAME audit[1760]: AVC apparmor="DENIED"
operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" pid=1760 comm="cupsd"
capability=12 capname="net_>

I'm not seeing a problem there? CUPS didn't start first time round because
something was busy, but tried again and succeeded.

Post by Java Jive
4) UBSAN
This is on a laptop with two on-board GPUs, and I think is related to
that fact. However, there were no hits under DuckDuckGo, Google, or
Yahoo for ...
Ubuntu 22 "UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in
/build/linux-hwe-6.8-W0MdK2/linux-hwe-6.8-6.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c:633:33"

UBSAN is the Undefined Behaviour Sanitiser, ie a debugging tool. Something
went wrong in the driver for AMD Radeon GPUs, ie a bug, maybe due to the
relatively elderly GPU you have. If you aren't using the AMD GPU you can
ignore it if it's not actually causing a crash (or could disable the driver
if you wanted).

Post by Java Jive
5) Initiating RAM registers
The following is occurring very early in the logs on 2 machines with
32GB RAM, and seems to be about how set up registers for RAM access, as
per these two links ...

This seems to be related to an MTRR problem - maybe the hardware doesn't let
the kernel find the optimal memory layout with more RAM than it was
originally designed for. How much RAM does Linux show you have after it's
booted? Does it lose any memory, and can you live with having the amount
that remains?

Most of these seem like 'new Linux, old hardware' issues, but nothing
actually to worry me there. I'd check you're on the latest BIOS as that
might help some of the ACPI related issues.

Theo

Java Jive

2024-12-12 12:11:05 UTC

Permalink

Post by Theo

That means it can't work out which interrupt controller is used for a
particular interrupt. Likely means the ACPI tables are incomplete. If
everything works you can ignore this.

Everything of any importance seems to be working, but see also my reply
to Andy regarding the COM port.

Post by Theo

Are you actually running NFS? If not you can ignore this.

Yes, and it *seems* to be running fine, so I'm not sure what is going on
here.

Post by Theo

I'm not seeing a problem there? CUPS didn't start first time round because
something was busy, but tried again and succeeded.

I see, but then presumably it's an error by the folk who wrote the code
to flag it as an error.

Post by Theo

I understand. I'm not aware of any problems with graphics under Ubuntu.

Post by Theo

lsmem gives ...

***@HOSTNAME:home# lsmem
RANGE SIZE STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK
0x0000000000000000-0x00000000bfffffff 3G online yes 0-23
0x0000000100000000-0x000000083fffffff 29G online yes 32-263

Memory block size: 128M
Total online memory: 32G
Total offline memory: 0B

... so Ubuntu seems to be able to access all the actual physical RAM.

Post by Theo
Most of these seem like 'new Linux, old hardware' issues, but nothing
actually to worry me there. I'd check you're on the latest BIOS as that
might help some of the ACPI related issues.

I see. Thanks very much for your help, Theo, much appreciated.

--
Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk